L’approche du ‘design science au cœur du débat rigueur / pertinence

Volume : (3), Issue : 211, April - 2018

Abstract : The aim of this paper is to highlight the 'design science' approach which is of growing interest in many European and American journals and conferences. This approach has received too little attention in the French IS community. In this paper, we have chosen to present it by deepening both its contributions but also its limits to the rigor and relevance debate that animates the community.

Article: Download PDF Journal DOI : 2364/2018

Cite This Article:

Article No : 10034

Number of Downloads : 101

References :

• Avenier M.-J. (2009), « Par le paradigme des sciences de l’artificiel, déployer la pensée complexe dans l’interaction de pratiques et recherches », Synergies Monde, n° 6, pp. 51-81.
• Avenier M.-J. (2010), « Shaping a Constructivist View of Organization Design Science », Organization studies, Vol. 31, n°9/10, pp. 1229-1255.
• Baskerville R. (2008), « What design science is not », European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 17, pp. 441-443.
• Benbasat I. et Zmud R. (1999), « Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance », MIS Quarterly, vol. 23, n°1, pp. 3-16.
• Carlsson S.A. (2006), « Towards an information systems design research framework: a critical realist perspective », in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science Research in IT (DESRIST), Claremont, CA, February.
• Cole R., Purao S., Rossi M. et Sein M. K. (2005), « Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research », Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Information Systems, D. Avison, D. Galletta, et J. I. DeGross (eds.), Las Vegas, NV, December 1114, pp. 325-336.
• Dennis A. R. (2001), « Relevance in Information Systems Research », Communications of the Association for Information Systems, n°6, pp. 40-42.
• Gaspoz C. et Pigneur Y. (2007), « A Design Science Approach for Developing Prediction Markets in a R&D community », ISI Working Paper.
• Goldkuhl G. (2004), « Design Theories in Information Systems – a need for multi-grounding », Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), Vol. 6, n°2, pp. 59-62.
• Gregor S. et Jones D. (2007), « The Anatomy of a Design Theory », Journal of Association for Information Sys tems, Vol.8, n°5, pp. 312-335.
• Hevner A. (2007), « A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research », Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol.19, n°2, pp. 87-92.
• Hevner A.R., March S.T., Park J. et Ram S. (2004) , « Design Science in Information Systems Research », MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, pp. 75-106.
• Iivari J. et Venable J. (2009), « Action Research and Design Science Research: Seemingly Similar But Decidedly Dissimilar », Proceedings of 17th European Conference on Information Systems, Verona, Italy, June 8-10.
• March S.T. et Smith G.F. (1995), « Design and natural science research on information technology », Decision Support Systems, vol. 15, pp. 251-266.
• Markus M.L., Majchrzak A. et Gasser L. (2002) , « A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes », MIS Quarterly, vol. 26, pp. 179212.
• McKay J. (2005), « Review of Design Science in IS », 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, 29 Nov – 2 Dec 2005.
• McKay J. et Marshall P. (2005), « A Review of Design Science in Information Systems », Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems, November 30 - December 2, Sydney.
• Niehaves B. (2007), « On epistemological pluralism in design science », Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 19, n°2, pp. 93-104.
• Orlikowski W. J. et Iacono C. S. (2001), « Research commentary : Desperately seeking "IT" in IT research – A call to theorizing the IT artifact », Information Systems Research, vol. 12, n°2, pp. 121-134.
• Pascal A., Thomas C. et Romme A.G.L. (2009), « An integrative design methodology to support an interorganizational knowledge management solution », Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix, 15-18 Décembre.
• Peffers K., Tuunanen T., Rothenberger M. A. et Chatterjee S. (2007), « A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research », Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 24, n°3, pp. 45-77.
• Pries-Heje J. et Baskerville R. (2008), « The Design Theory Nexus », MIS Quarterly, Vol. 32, n°4, pp. 731-755.
• Pries-Heje J., Baskerville R. et Venable J. (2007), « Soft Design Science Research: Extending the Boundaries of Evaluation in Design Science Research », Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Design Science Research in IT (DESRIST), Pasadena, CA, May 13-15, pp. 18-38.
• Romme A. G. L. (2003), « Making a difference: Organization as design », Organization Science, Vol. 14, pp. 558-573.
• Romme A. G. L. et Endenburg G. (2006), « Construction principles and design rules in the case of circular design », Organization Science, Vol. 17, pp. 287-297.
• Rossi M. et Sein M.K. (2003), « Design research workshop: a proactive research approach », http://tiesrv.hkkk.fi/iris26/presentation/workshop_des ignRes.pdf.
• Sein M. K., Henfridsson O., Purao S., Rossi M. et Lindgren R. (2011), « Action Design Research », MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, n° 1, PP. 37-56.
• Simon H. (1996), The Sciences of the Artificial, 3 rd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge.
• Van Aken J. E. (2005), « Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management », British Journal of Management, Vol. 16, pp. 19-36.
• Venable J. (2006), « A Framework for Design Science Research Activities », Proceedings of the 2006 Information Resource Management Association Conference, Washington, DC, USA.
• Walls J. G., Widmeyer G. R. et El Sawy O. A. (1992), « Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS », Information Systems Research, vol.3, n°1, pp. 36-58.
• Weber R. (2003), « Editor's Comments: Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact », MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, n°2, pp. iii-xi.
• Winter R. (2008), « Design science research in Europe », European Journal of Information Systems, Vol.17, pp. 470–475.