Techniques to Avoid Bleeding of Gingiva during Dental Restorations – Hand Instrument for Gingival Displacement

Authore(s) : González-GonzálezJesús M || Ballicher of Medicine

Volume : (7), Issue : (11), November - 2018

Abstract : Introduction: when a dental restorative treatment is done near the gingiva, it can bleed and restoration will be defective. Theaim of this work was to study techniques that prevent the bleeding of the gingiva during dental restorations and propose a hand instrument for gingival displacement. Materials and methods: It was made a review of dental products distributed online through the web pages of 50 companies, from 6 different European countries. It was tried to locate materials and hand instruments to prevent bleeding of the gingiva during dental restorations. Results: no hand instrument was found among the materials distributed by those companies for that purpose. We propose an instrument consisting of three parts: an "active part, "a "handle" and a "zone of union". Discussion: for its application, it is placed in the "free gingival sulcus". Direct pressure on the gingiva gives hemostasis, which facilitates the restoration. Conclusions: the usefulness of this instrument is in "Conservative Dentistry" to restore tooth cervical lesions.

Article: Download PDF Journal DOI : 142/231

Cite This Article:

Article No : 12014

Number of Downloads : 100

References :

[1] Baum Ll, Philips R, Lund M. Tratado de operatoria dental. 2ª ed. Mexico: Nueva Editorial Interamericana, 1987:23-6. [2] Davison CL, Kemp-Scholte CM. Inconvenientes de las resinas composite en las restauraciones de clase V. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. Ed. Esp. 1991; 1(1):7-10. [3] Hempton TJ, Drakos D, Nart J, Santos A. Tratamiento de la lesión de clase V: ¿Alargamiento o acortamiento de la corona? Periodoncia y osteointegración... More

[1] Baum Ll, Philips R, Lund M. Tratado de operatoria dental. 2ª ed. Mexico: Nueva Editorial Interamericana, 1987:23-6. [2] Davison CL, Kemp-Scholte CM. Inconvenientes de las resinas composite en las restauraciones de clase V. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. Ed. Esp. 1991; 1(1):7-10. [3] Hempton TJ, Drakos D, Nart J, Santos A. Tratamiento de la lesión de clase V: ¿Alargamiento o acortamiento de la corona? Periodoncia y osteointegración 2007; 17(2):75- 84. [4] Grandini R, Bertini F, Marri M. La aplicación Del separador de ivory en las reconstrucciones dentales. Av. en Odontoestomatol 1989; 6:355-65. [5] Anupam P, Namratha N, Vibha S, Anandakrishna GN, Shally K, Singh A. Efficacy of two gingival retraction systems on lateral gingival displacement: A prospective clinical study.J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2013;3(2):68- 72. [6] Bennani V, Inger M, Aarts JM. Comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement materials.J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112(2):163-7. [7] Prasanna GS, Reddy K, Kumar RK, Shivaprakash S. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013; 14(2):217-21. [8] Kumbuloglu O, User A, Toksavul S, Boyacioglu H. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords.Quintessence Int. 2007;38(2):e92-8. [9] Jokstad A. Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81(3):258-61. [10] Shivasakthy M, Asharaf Ali S. Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Gingival Retraction using Polyvinyl Acetate Strips and ConventionalRetraction Cord - An in Vivo Study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(10):2368-71. [11] Lozano De Luaces V, Robledano Vicente L, Latre Barluenga A. Valoración del grado de contaminación de las preparaciones cavitarias usando diferentes métodos de aislamiento. Revista Europea de Odontoestomatología 1993; V (4):206-8. [12] Langerweger CH. Aislamiento del campo operatorio en odontología infantil. El aislamiento Del campo operatorio con dique de goma. Quintessence (ed. esp.) 2001; 14(10):636-46. [13] Liebenberg WH. Rubber dam isolation of cervical lesions. Part 1: alternative technique which avoid injury to the periodontium. FDI World 1994; 3(5):17-8, 20, and 22. [14]Anton-Radigales M. Imitación de la encía con composite. Cirugía mucogingival no quirúrgica. RCOE 2005; 10(3):309-321. [15] Hong LG, Guo LP, Xue LL. Gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord for fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review.Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2013; 22(4):456-61. [16] Chaudhari J, Prajapati P, Patel J, Sethuraman R, Naveen YG. Comparative evaluation of the amount of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction systems: An in vivo study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015; 6(2):189-95. [17] Lahoti KS. Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study.Contemp Clin Dent. 2016; 7(1):27-30. [18] Burke FJ, Crisp Revaluation of a novel compule-based gingival retraction system in UK general dental practices. Dent Update. 2014; 41(5):432-4, 437-8. [19]Akca EA, Yildirim E, Dalkiz M, Yavuzyilmaz H, Beydemir B. Effects of different retraction medicaments on gingival tissue.Quintessence Int. 2006;37(1):53-9. [20] Bowles WH, Tardy SJ, Vahadi A. Evaluation of new gingival retraction agents’ Dent Res. 1991;70(11):1447- 9. [21] García Barbero AE, Baños Martin JL, García Barbero J. Problematical de lasso’s matrices para composite en dientes posteriores. Av. en odontoestomatol. 1995; 11:503-12. [22]Gupta A, Prithviraj DR, Gupta D, Shruti DP. Clinical evaluation of three new gingival retraction systems: a research report.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013; 13(1):36- 42. [23] Polat NT, Ozdemir AK, Turgut M. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow.Int J Prosthodont. 2007; 20(1):57-62. [24] Huang C, Somar M, Li K, Mohadeb JV. Efficiency of Cordless Versus Cord Techniques of Gingival Retraction: A Systematic Review Prosthodont. 2015: Sep 17. Version of record online: doi: 10.1111/jopr.12352. [25] Lodetti G 1 , D'Abrosca F, Fontana P, Pavoni E, Gigola P. Set up of in vitro methods able to detect the safety of astringent liquids. Minerva Stomatol. 2004; 53(6):361-7. [26] Sarmento HR, Leite FR, Dantas RV, Ogliari FA, Demarco FF, Faot F. A double-blind randomised clinical trial of two techniques for gingival displacement.J Oral Rehabil. 2014; 41(4):306-13. [27] Liu CM, Huang FM, Yang LC, Chou LS, Chou MY, Chang YC. Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro.J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31(4):368-72. [28] Pesson DM, Bakou OD, Didia EL, Kouame A, Blohoua MR, Djeredou KB. Gingival displacement techniques in daily practice. Survey among dental surgeons in Abidjan, Ivory Coast.Odontostomatol Trop. 2015; 38(152):25-32. [29] Acar Ö, Erkut S, Özçelik TB, Ozdemır E, Akçil M. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 111(5):388-94. [30] Shrivastava KJ, Bhoyar A, Agarwal S, Shrivastava S, Parlani S, Murthy V. Comparative clinical efficacy evaluation of three gingival displacement systems.J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(Suppl 1):S53-7. [31] Bennani V, Aarts JM, He LH. A comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement techniques.J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107(6):388-92. [32]Tabassum S, Adnan S, and Khan FR. Gingival Retraction Methods: A Systematic Review.J Prosthodont. 2016 Jul 28. Version of record online: doi: 10.1111/jopr.12522. [33] Bennani V, Schwass D, Chandler N. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status.J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139(10):1354-63.... Less