Commentary A further critique of growth economics
Volume : (13) , Issue : 205, January - 2019
Abstract : Four years ago I wrote a critique of the “Growth Report”, a two-year study by the prestigious international Commission on Growth and Development, published by the World Bank (Anon.,2008). Here I would like to reflect on the “reaction” to my review— specifically that it was ignored! Many issues and many people are deservedly ignored. But should we ignore the question of whether growth still increases wealth faster than illth, as it did in the past empty world, or whether in the new full world it has begun to in- crease illth faster than wealth? Is growth still economic in the literal sense, or has it become uneconomic? This is the main question raised in my review. Surely it is not a trivial question, and my discomfort at seeing it roundly ignored transcends the mere personal pique that one feels at being brushed off. So I will begin with a few remarks on why I think my critical review failed to initiate a dialog with the authors of the Growth Report, and why I think that is indicative of a deeper failing within the economics profession. Following that I will consider the eleven fallacies and confusions that in my experience most frequently obstruct reasoning about growth.
Keywords :Uneconomic growth World Bank, Commission on Growth and Development, Wealth and illth, Limiting factor, Complementarity and substitutability, Funds and flows.
Article: Download PDF Journal DOI : 301/704
Cite This Article:
A further critique of growth economics
Vol.I (13) , Issue.I 205